The properties were kept by us in trusts. Throughout the approximately a decade we were lovers before

The properties were kept by us in trusts. Throughout the approximately a decade we were lovers before

Their divorce or separation and our wedding there have been properties we purchased together plus some Don purchased by himself or with an other woman, Pam. I put all of those I had not worked on into one trust when we married. The people from our joint efforts had been held in a trust that is separate. The trust keeping the properties I became perhaps maybe not involved with was put up along with his kids as beneficiaries if he passed and called the PRSL Land Trust. I became the beneficiary of this trust holding the properties I became tangled up in. Everyone can search their title into the records that are public 1950 – 1997 to see this is certainly real.

The key Individuals Interviewed and Their Lies

Anne McQueen is called Don’s trusted associate. A couple of months before|months that are few their disappearance we caught her embezzling approximately $600,000 in properties by purchasing them with our funds and placing them inside her title. She was ordered by a court them. Perhaps not the most readily useful indicator of integrity, credibility, you to definitely think. Conservatorship instance #97-CP-002001

Wendell Williams. We made that loan to Wendell when he bought the 40 acres that became the sanctuary. He dug down dust for construction, searching an 18 acre 30-foot hole that is deep our knowing. Then he started running the opening as an unlawful dumpsite for construction debris. The opening full of water whenever he hit. He stopped making repayments. We foreclosed on him and finished up with.

Wendell is a tremendously good con guy and Don proceeded to manage him not surprisingly. Through the right time whenever Don had been decreasing mentally, we over and over observed Wendell cheating Don. Don liked to hold a great deal. I heard Wendell telling Don, “Remember that two grand you borrowed from me? ” and saw Don taken off two thousand dollars and offered it to him. A hours that are few, we saw Wendell do it again, and due to Don’s dementia, Don taken off two thousand bucks again and provided it to Wendell. We confronted Wendell about this. After that Wendell did everything he could to produce a rift between Don and me personally. Numerous, bigger, deals where Wendell ended up being scamming Don. He had been persuading Don he had been offering Don properties by handing him paper he stated had been deeds but weren’t. Don, whom could not read, thought him and would provide him money and checks for quantities in excess of $60,000 thinking he ended up being property that is purchasing. Conservatorship situation #97-CP-002001

Don’s spouse Gladys Lewis Cross and daughters Donna Pettis, Lynda Sanchez & Gale Rathbone. Personally I think for Gladys because all women in Don’s orbit adored him. He might make you’re feeling him; the only one he ever really loved like you were the only woman in the world; the only one who understood. Into the show Gladys helps it be sound she found out about me like she told Don their marriage was over when. Don was unfaithful to her also it ended up being well known by her and generally speaking. When you look at the 1998 Dateline / individuals Magazine article Anne McQueen said she had been possibly the woman that is only didn’t decide to try to have sexual intercourse with. Also Don’s child relates into the show to Don’s condition as being a “sexaholic. ”

When Gladys demanded a breakup in 1989 a person she wanted to marry at her church.

Therefore she told Don that her a quick divorce she would settle for one million dollars if he would give. She plus the daughters caused Don properties she would get on with, vehicles, precious jewelry and coins. I happened to be told that Don’s daughter that is oldest Donna Pettis later was able to lose all of it in the currency markets within the years that followed.

In 1996, despite their divorce that is prior settlement, Gladys, whom easily accuses me personally of being “greedy, ” filed a suit claiming she ended up being eligible to more. Cross Vs. Lewis 95-DR-005258 Daughters Donna and Lynda testified with respect to Gladys. Don expected Gale and Anne McQueen to testify on their behalf. Alternatively they testified for Gladys. At that time Don told me personally to expel them as beneficiaries associated with PSRL trust. Do this they were family and over time he would change his mind because I felt. Towards the most useful of my knowledge, he never ever talked to virtually any of these again.

After Don disappeared there have been many years of my being forced to handle the properties under a Conservatorship demanded by Gladys additionally the daughters. The attorneys that are numerous involved, all being paid out associated with the property, paid off the assets somewhat. Eventually the assets in the PRSL trust, which had the daughters as beneficiaries, visited them. Those assets were worth about $1 million. The assets into the other trust, well worth about $2mm at that time, stumbled on me personally. The claim girls built in the show that we picked the assets they got and they had been bad assets is nonsense. The assets were got by them through the trust these were beneficiaries of, worth $1 million.

Gladys and her daughters had strong motivations that are selfish lie while making implications concerning the meat grinder and Don being hidden from the property 23 years ago which have definitely no foundation in fact whatsoever in addition they proceeded to do this into the show.

The Supposed “Circumstantial” Proof

The show makes a huge deal out of Don having requested a restraining purchase that has been rejected and therefore the word “disappearance”

Used in the charged power of Attorney document. Both rational explanations the directors would not explain. Anne’s tale about being told by Don to produce the order that is restraining to police if something occurred to him will not make rational feeling predicated on her behavior after he disappeared.

For a Restraining Purchase. Don invested one per month in Costa Rica week. Don ended up being whom wished to daily. He’d visit Costa Rica during the i was having my menstrual cycle week. We accepted this as one thing We’d to reside with. During the week he had been away, haul the property off the maximum amount of associated with junk as I could. Wendell told Don I happened to be carrying this out. Don attempted calling the authorities to have them me personally. They told him he would require a restraining purchase. It really is ambiguous he should say I threatened him or if someone like Wendell suggested that if it was Don’s idea that to get a restraining order. Don filed for your order on 20, 1997, and it was denied june.

Don disappeared 2 months in the future August 18, 1997. Anne claims Don told her to offer the document into the police if any such thing took place to him. If somebody informs you that, together with individual vanishes 8 weeks later on, do you really “forget” that, as Anne claims? No, you remember and provide it to your authorities straight away. But Anne didn’t inform the authorities or me on me in a court hearing with Judge Sexton as a way to try and have herself appointed as Conservator of our estate about it until September 9, 1997, when she claims to have suddenly remembered just in time to spring it. Anne can be an embezzler and a liar and her claim that Don informed her “if such a thing occurs to me offer it towards the police” and she merely forgot that before the hearing three days later on is probably perhaps not legitimate. Later on, whenever Anne had been obligated to get back the embezzled properties, at the conclusion of the negotiations, aided by the matter now shut, she opened and said from removing the junk that she knew all along that the only reason Don applied for the restraining order was to stop me.